Sample Report  ·  Fictional company, for demonstration purposes only

AI Brand Visibility Audit  ·  Clearwater Financial Planning

How Four AI Systems
See Clearwater Financial Planning

This audit measures how accurately and prominently Clearwater Financial Planning, an independent fee-only advisory firm serving high-net-worth individuals and families in the Denver metropolitan area, surfaces across leading AI answer engines for queries spanning personal finance, retirement planning, wealth management, and local financial advisory services.

Overall AEO Score
65
OUT OF 100
Growing Presence
1–38 · Limited Presence
38–55 · Emerging Presence
55–72 · Growing Presence
72–100 · Strong Presence

Industry benchmark: top brands score 72–85

Overall Visibility Scores

Four leading AI platforms were independently evaluated on their knowledge of Clearwater Financial Planning across five key brand dimensions, each scored out of 100. The spread in results reveals where brand indexing is strong and where gaps remain.

Gemini
74/100
Rank #1
ChatGPT
68/100
Rank #2
Perplexity
61/100
Rank #3
Claude
55/100
Rank #4
Gemini
74
ChatGPT
68
Perplexity
61
Claude
55

Platform Assessments

Each AI platform reached a distinct conclusion based on the breadth and accuracy of brand data available across its training sources and live retrieval. These verdicts matter because AI systems don't just retrieve information, they synthesize it into a judgment. When a model has seen consistent, credible mentions of a brand across multiple sources, it responds with confidence. When the signal is thin, contradictory, or absent, the model either hedges, omits the brand entirely, or fills in gaps with inference. The verdict each platform delivers is effectively a proxy for how well the brand is represented across the web content that model was built on, and how confidently it would recommend the brand to someone asking.

Gemini  ·  74 / 100
74 / 100
Locally Recognizable, Thin on Category Authority
Gemini scores Clearwater Financial Planning at 74/100, the highest of the four platforms, citing a clear local identity and accurate recognition of the firm's fee-only advisory model. Brand Recognition reaches 16/20, reflecting consistent indexing across local business directories and the firm's website. However, Topical Authority scores just 13/20, the audit's weakest signal, reflecting a limited content footprint in category-level financial planning topics that would surface the brand in non-branded queries.
AI Knowledge Depth: Moderate
ChatGPT  ·  68 / 100
68 / 100
Present for Branded Queries, Absent in Category Search
ChatGPT scores Clearwater at 68/100, noting accurate direct recognition when the brand name is used but significantly weaker performance in category-level discovery. When asked about top financial advisors in Denver or best wealth management firms in Colorado, Clearwater does not surface, the firm is outcompeted by larger RIAs and national brands with heavier content footprints. Factual accuracy is strong at 15/20, but Category Presence at 14/20 and Topical Authority at 11/20 represent the clearest improvement opportunities.
AI Knowledge Depth: Moderate
Perplexity  ·  61 / 100
61 / 100
Partial Recognition, Depth Dependent on Direct Sourcing
Perplexity scores Clearwater at 61/100, drawing primarily from the firm's own website and a small number of directory citations. The platform correctly identifies the firm's location, service model, and client focus, but topical depth is limited, Perplexity's real-time sourcing model rewards brands with third-party citations, press mentions, and educational content, none of which Clearwater currently generates at meaningful volume. Topical Authority at 10/20 is the weakest individual category score in the audit.
AI Knowledge Depth: Shallow
Claude  ·  55 / 100
55 / 100
Minimal Training Data, Recognition Is Fragile
Claude scores Clearwater at 55/100, the lowest of the four platforms, reflecting a thin presence in the training data sources Claude draws from most heavily, long-form articles, industry publications, third-party reviews, and authoritative financial content. Direct recognition exists but is shallow, with Brand Recognition at 12/20 indicating the firm does not consistently surface even in identity-level queries without strong contextual prompting. This score represents the most significant opportunity for improvement across the audit.
AI Knowledge Depth: Shallow
Rich

Extensive, accurate information across AI sources. Appears consistently in relevant searches with strong factual grounding.

Moderate

Partial AI visibility with some indexed presence. May appear in certain searches but lacks depth or breadth across all platforms.

Shallow

Minimal presence in AI sources. Rarely surfaces in relevant searches, a significant AEO opportunity.

Dimension Scores

Each platform was scored across five dimensions (each out of 20) that together make up the overall visibility score. This breakdown shows not just how well each AI knows the brand, but what it knows, and what it doesn't.

Platform Brand Recognition Category Presence Sentiment Factual Accuracy Topical Authority
Gemini 1615151513
ChatGPT 1514131511
Perplexity 1312131310
Claude 121112128
Avg /20 141313.313.810.5
Does the AI know who Clearwater Financial Planning is, name, location, history, and services? Does the AI surface Clearwater Financial Planning unprompted when a user searches for companies in this category? When the AI discusses Clearwater Financial Planning, is the tone positive, neutral, or negative? Are specific details about Clearwater Financial Planning, founding year, leadership, and service model, accurate and consistent? Does Clearwater Financial Planning's content signal enough expertise that the AI surfaces them for category-level questions, independent of direct name recognition?

Branded Presence vs. Unbranded Presence

Not all AI queries are equal. Some include the brand name directly: a user who already knows Clearwater Financial Planning exists and is asking about it. Others never mention the brand at all: a potential customer describing a problem or searching for a category, where AI decides who to surface on its own. Branded presence measures the first type. Unbranded presence measures the second. A brand can score well on branded queries simply because it exists and has some web presence. Unbranded presence is harder to earn, requiring that AI platforms independently associate your brand with the right topics, services, and locations without any cue from the user. The gap between the two scores reveals how dependent your AI visibility is on people already knowing your name.

71%

Branded Presence

Queries that include “Clearwater Financial Planning” by name, simulating a user who already knows the brand and is asking AI about it directly. Clearwater Financial Planning appeared accurately in 71% of these results. A low branded presence score means AI is returning incomplete or inaccurate information even to people who already know you exist.

52%

Unbranded Presence

Queries that never mention Clearwater Financial Planning, simulating a potential customer describing a need or searching a category where AI must choose who to recommend from scratch. Clearwater Financial Planning appeared in 52% of these results. This is where most real discovery happens, and where the biggest growth opportunity lies.

Radar Comparison

The “shape” of each AI's radar profile reveals something a single score can't, which dimensions of the brand are well understood and which ones are blank spots. A wide, even shape means the AI has a complete and balanced picture of the brand across all five dimensions. A narrow or lopsided shape means certain dimensions (like services, authority, or local presence) are barely indexed at all. The gap between platforms is equally telling: when one AI has a full shape and another has almost nothing, it usually points to where the brand's information is published and what sources each model draws from. The goal is a wide, even profile across all four platforms.

Gemini Has the Richest Picture
Gemini's 74/100 reflects the most complete and evenly shaped radar profile in the audit, with scores ranging from 13 to 16 across all five dimensions. This consistency indicates a solid but not deep indexed presence, Clearwater is recognizable and factually accurate across Gemini's sources, but the topical footprint is not yet broad enough to drive strong category discovery. Closing the gap between Gemini and the other platforms should be the near-term focus.
Brand Recognition Leads All Categories
Brand Recognition averages 14/20 across platforms, the strongest individual category in the audit. This indicates that Clearwater's direct identity, name, location, and basic service description, is reliably indexed across AI sources, driven primarily by the firm's website, Google Business Profile, and directory listings. This foundation is solid and means that brand-name queries return accurate results. The challenge is extending this recognition into non-branded discovery contexts.
Topical Authority Is the Critical Gap
With an average of just 10.5/20, Topical Authority is the weakest dimension across the entire audit, and the single highest-leverage improvement opportunity. AI platforms determine topical authority by identifying whether a brand produces or is cited in substantive, expert-level content on topics relevant to their category. Clearwater currently lacks published educational content, third-party citations, and industry commentary that would signal expertise to AI systems evaluating financial planning authority at scale.

Cross-Platform Insights

Three strengths and three gaps appeared consistently across all four AI systems, independent of which model was doing the evaluating. These are the most reliable signals in the audit. Individual platform scores can vary based on training data cutoffs, source weighting, or retrieval quirks. But when all four models independently agree on something, a strength or a gap, it reflects something real about how the brand is (or isn't) represented across the broader web. The strengths here are worth protecting and reinforcing. The gaps are the highest-priority items to address, because fixing them will likely improve visibility across every platform at once rather than just one.

Consistent Strengths

Local Brand Identity Is Clear and Consistent
All four platforms correctly identify Clearwater Financial Planning as a Denver-based independent advisory firm with a fee-only service model. This consistency reflects reliable indexing of the firm's website, NAP (name, address, phone) data, and local directory presence. For branded queries, searches that include the firm's name or a direct description of it, the brand surfaces accurately and without significant factual errors across all platforms evaluated.
Fee-Only Model Is Correctly Understood
The firm's fee-only, fiduciary advisory model is accurately identified by every platform, a meaningful differentiator in a category where AI systems frequently conflate commission-based and fee-only advisors. This correct characterization positions Clearwater well for searches from informed buyers who specifically seek fiduciary advisors, a growing segment of financially literate users who use AI to research and compare advisory firms before making contact.
Sentiment Is Positive Across All Platforms
No platform surfaced negative sentiment, controversy, or reputational risk associated with Clearwater Financial Planning. Sentiment averages 13.3/20, not exceptional, but solidly neutral-to-positive. The deductions reflect a limited volume of independently corroborated positive coverage rather than any identified negative narrative. This is a clean baseline that makes improving visibility straightforward: the brand has no reputational headwinds to overcome before investing in discoverability.

Consistent Gaps

Category Discovery Fails Outside Branded Queries
When AI platforms are asked about the best financial advisors in Denver, top fee-only planners in Colorado, or retirement planning specialists in the Rocky Mountain region, Clearwater Financial Planning does not consistently surface. The brand's Category Presence averages 13/20, placing it squarely in the middle tier of local financial advisors rather than among the firms AI systems default to when describing the category. Without a stronger organic content and citation footprint, this gap is structural.
No Third-Party Citations Supporting Expertise
Across all four platforms, the sources underlying Clearwater's AI visibility are almost entirely self-generated, the firm's own website, its Google Business Profile, and a small number of generic directory listings. No third-party press coverage, industry commentary, client testimonials indexed by AI systems, or citations in financial planning publications were identified. AI platforms heavily weight external corroboration when evaluating brand authority; its absence is the primary driver of the low Topical Authority scores across this audit.
No Educational Content Signaling Expertise
Clearwater's website and online presence do not include substantive educational content, articles, guides, tools, or commentary on financial planning topics, that AI systems can draw from when evaluating topical expertise. This absence directly explains the audit's lowest category score: Topical Authority at 10.5/20. Brands that consistently publish useful, expert-level content on high-intent topics in their category are surfaced by AI systems as authorities, independent of whether their name is mentioned in the query.

Local Visibility

Local AI visibility breaks into two distinct buying signals. Location queries include a city or geographic area and represent high-intent demand: buyers who already know what they want and where they want it, actively evaluating options. Discovery queries carry no location context and represent an awareness opportunity: buyers still exploring a category, where appearing means AI surfaces your brand unprompted to an audience you would not otherwise reach.

AI Local Capture Score

43

AI mentions you in about 2 in 5 local searches

Location queries

Includes your geographical location

2 / 4

Discovery queries

Without any geographical location

1 / 4

Location queries

High intent

Clearwater Financial Planning earns local placement on two of four platforms for fee-only financial advisor queries in the Denver metro area, capturing buyers who are already in decision mode. Local AI signals are strongest where directory and Google Business Profile data is consistent, but the firm is absent from platforms that rely on editorial citations and third-party coverage to surface local results.

Discovery queries

Awareness reach

Clearwater surfaces on only one of four platforms when queries carry no location or brand context, representing a significant untapped reach opportunity. Buyers searching by category alone are at an earlier stage of the funnel and represent a broad awareness channel the firm has yet to unlock.

2 of 4
Local Query Platforms
found you with location context
1 of 4
Discovery Platforms
found you without location context
Top Local Strength
Gemini and Perplexity both surface Clearwater for location-specific fee-only advisor queries in Denver, driven by an active Google Business Profile and consistent NAP data across NAPFA and directory listings. This is the firm's most reliable local AI signal.
Top Local Gap
ChatGPT and Claude do not surface Clearwater for any Denver-area financial advisor queries, including high-intent searches for fee-only planners. Both platforms rely on editorial citations and third-party coverage that Clearwater has not yet built, representing the highest-volume local visibility gap in this audit.
Best Platform for Local
Gemini surfaces Clearwater most consistently across local queries, drawing on its connection to Google Business Profile data and local map signals. Its ability to link structured directory data with geographic search context makes it the most reliable local visibility channel for this brand in the current audit cycle.
Top Discovery Strength
Perplexity is the only platform that surfaces Clearwater in open-ended, location-free discovery queries, driven by its live retrieval from NAPFA.org and financial planning directories. This makes directory citation the brand's single active discovery signal when no geographic anchor is present.
Top Discovery Gap
Clearwater surfaces on two platforms when Denver is part of the query, but drops to one when the city is removed. The firm's AI visibility is heavily location-dependent, relying on Gemini's Google Business Profile connection and Perplexity's directory citations to appear, neither of which activate consistently without a geographic anchor.
Best discovery platform
Perplexity is the only platform that surfaces Clearwater in open-ended, location-free discovery queries. Its live retrieval from NAPFA.org and financial planning directories gives it a broader signal set than platforms relying on static training data, making directory citations the most reliable pathway to discovery-query visibility for this brand.

Prompts

High-Intent Discovery Prompts

The six most common prompts users enter when searching for brands like Clearwater Financial Planning. AI users tend to ask in full sentences, conversational, intent-driven questions that function as long-tail queries. Brands that appear in response to these prompts are capturing high-intent discovery moments that would never show up in a standard keyword rank report.

“financial advisors in Denver Colorado”
Brand Appears
This is a high-intent, geographically specific query that closely matches Clearwater's stated location and core service offering. The brand surfaces on Perplexity and Gemini for queries of this type, benefiting from its local directory presence and consistent NAP data, though it does not appear on all platforms or in the top positions when multiple advisors are listed.
“fee-only financial planner near me”
Brand Not Mentioned
Despite the fee-only model being a core differentiator, Clearwater does not surface in this high-intent query because the brand lacks structured content explicitly targeting this search context. AI platforms pull from advisor comparison sites, NAPFA directories, and brands with dedicated fee-only landing pages. Clearwater's website mentions the model but does not build content around it in a way that earns category placement.
“best wealth management firms in Colorado”
Brand Not Mentioned
Broader regional category queries like this one surface firms with strong third-party directory presence, editorial coverage in publications like Forbes Advisor or Barron's, and review volume on platforms indexed by AI systems. Clearwater currently lacks the external citation footprint needed to appear in these comparative, list-style AI responses, a gap that represents the highest-volume missed visibility opportunity in this audit.
“retirement planning advice for high net worth individuals”
Brand Not Mentioned
This query targets Clearwater's stated client segment directly, but without educational content addressing retirement planning for high-net-worth clients, the brand does not earn a mention. AI platforms source responses to topic-level queries from brands with substantial published expertise, not just service pages. A content strategy built around this query type would directly address the Topical Authority gap identified throughout this audit.
“Clearwater Financial Planning Denver reviews”
Brand Appears
Branded review queries return accurate results, with Clearwater's Google Business Profile and a small number of review platform listings surfacing consistently. This confirms that the firm's direct reputation is clean and findable, but the volume of indexed reviews is low relative to competitors, which limits the depth of the AI response and reduces the authority signals that accompany a robust, independently verified review footprint.
“how to choose a financial advisor for retirement”
Brand Not Mentioned
Informational queries like this are among the highest-volume entry points in the financial planning category, used by potential clients at the beginning of their research process. Brands that publish authoritative content addressing this question, and that earn citations from other sources, are consistently surfaced in AI responses. Clearwater's absence here reflects its broader content gap and represents a direct path to improved discovery among its target audience.